CNS Water

The purpose of this page is to share information about Clayton Nolte’s biophotonic structured water units. We have modulated our enthusiasm and amazement over “structured” or natural water by giving a simple presentation of information…

What does structured water do? To cut to the chase, go to a close-up look at what scientists and photographers are recording:

  • European lab test photo results, comparing local tap water with CN structured tap water. The differences are graphic! Scroll down to see the photos.
  • Scroll down to see a photographic comparison between trees grown with CN biophotonic structured water and trees on the same property put on structured water 8 months later

  • More info needed? Try googling: there is a scientific study on the “glow” emitted by different types of liquids – distilled water, tap water and structured water. Also a youtube showing blood test imaging before and 12 minutes after drinking one glass of structured water (go to the 2.15 mark for the section concerned). 

You may find drinking biophotonic structured water is the most valuable health insurance you have ever invested in!
about $1 a day for one year for a basic Kitchen (under sink) structured water unit
$3 a day for one year only for a basic Whole House structured water unit that is lifetime guaranteed.
Here’s to the very good health of you and everyone who drinks water at your home!

    • This site was put together by Anthea G
    • For info on structured water:
    • You’re welcome to speak with Victoria at 520.325.3400 (M-F 10am-5pm AZ time)

Photo credits: Source of photos on this site is Victoria White, unless indicated otherwise




A company in Spain (Arlis Hispania SL) asked a professional laboratory in Germany (Hagalis Laboratory) to conduct a crystallization analysis of two water samples: ordinary (‘neutral’) tap water, and the same type of water run through a Clayton Nolte water structuring device.

The BEFORE / AFTER photos record extraordinary changes ~ structured water (“after”) on the left, neutral water (“before”) on the right:


Here are the concluding remarks in the Hagalis Laboratory report (our caps): 

The CNS Water sample (photo on left, above)

Some highlights from the “Crystallization analysis” on p.4 of the report, accompanied by a selection of photos:

  • The ‘neutral’ sample (tap water) shows a lot of 90-degree angle structures. There are none in the CNS Water sample. This means the structuring process has neutralized the toxic substances present in the tap water.
  • CNS Water sample shows star-shaped 60-degree angle structures associated with ‘Good to Very Good’ spring water quality:
  • Crystals in ‘neutral’ sample were heavily compacted, associated (among other things) with deposits of lime and other minerals. CNS Water sample shows hardly any compacted areas, and the small crystals that do appear are “less prone to precipitation”. “Technical equipment operates perfectly using this quality of water,” a major factor for maintenance and durability of any devices using water, including water pipes in the home, coolers, water heaters, kitchen equipment etc.
  • The surface formation of the crystals in the CNS Water sample has increased sharply, indicating an increase in the availability of the minerals for human absorption.
  • The CNS Water sample “provides more trace elements and minerals… The general level of vitality has increased considerably… –  high quality biological value.”  (Hagalis Lab Report on Clayton Nolte structured water sample)

p.1: Analysis was done on chrystallized material from the liquid and solid state of the 2 samples, resulting in chrystallization pictures (see end of the report) that show recognizable characteristics associated with various types of water – for example, spring water, water that is polluted, etc.
p.2: Table showing the results
p.3: Technical description of the analysis: what was analysed and how
p.4: Chrystallization analysis
p.5: Chemical analysis
pp.6-8: Photos, analysis
p.9: Comparative photos, Summary


To order a Clayton Nolte structured water unit: contact Victoria at
You’re welcome to speak with Victoria at 520.325.3400 (M-F 10am-5pm AZ time)
Organic methods or structured water?

Is it possible to differentiate the effect of a green thumb and organic soil amendments from the effect of CN structured water?

Yes! What is fascinating on Victoria White’s land are the organic trees that are NOT as big as her other trees. All the trees were planted in January 2008, have received the same organic soil treatments since then, the same drip water irrigation, the same ‘green thumb’ effect and the same lack of any pruning. So why are some trees smaller, more immature and less productive? It turns out they were put on structured water about 8 months after the other trees!

Thanks to a quirk of Victoria’s garden budget, the almond trees on her property in August 2010 provide an objective way to differentiate how much credit for the tree size and productivity is due to Victoria’s in-depth organic gardening techniques and green thumb (used equally on all the trees) and how much is due to structured water ~ which was introduced directly into the garden in two distinct phases, the first in August 2009 and the second about 8 months later, in the Spring of 2010.

It will be interesting to see next year, in August 2011, whether the smaller trees have caught up with the larger trees after a year on structured water. The trunk size especially is a helpful benchmark in comparing the trees. As can be seen below, there are three types of almond, identified as A1, A2 and A3. In August 2010, all three types of almond trees on non-structured water range from 5″ to 6.5″ trunks; the three types on structured water range from 9″ to 10.5″ trunks. That is a significant difference in growth and rate of maturity, any way you look at it.

Details and photos below.


Groundbreaking update from Victoria, 10-12 August 2010

In an email response to the information on the Organic fruit trees page, Victoria writes: 

Looks good! Just for clarification, when we first planted the trees [January 2008], I did not know who Clayton Nolte was and only had a vague idea what structured water meant. It wasn’t until about 8 months later [August 2008] that I found out about his water structuring devices, and purchased the whole house unit. So none of the trees were being watered with structured water initially, although I’m convinced that once we got our home unit on, they were being affected by entrainment and the field effect from their proximity to our house. It wasn’t until about a year later [around August 2009] that we got our first garden unit and started directly watering with structured water. The irrigation line we were using was 500 feet long, and even now I can tell the difference in size between the trees within the ‘300 feet of straight pipe’ range. In October 2009 we started expanding our underground water pipes around our property so I could tie the irrigation lines into a spigot close enough to what was being watered to ensure it was getting structured water. I believe it was in the spring of 2010 that I finally got around to cutting the 500 foot long line into two approximately 250 foot long sections. Even the trees that were initially outside the 300 feet of structured water range, which tend to be smaller than the others, still did bear fruit this year, and some even did last year too.    Victoria


Note: When structured water flows down a straight pipe for more than 300 feet, it loses its structure, becoming unstructured.

PHOTO GALLERY   All pictures taken by Victoria White 12-13 August 2010. Click on image to enlarge.


> Almond trees inside 300′ limit
recd structured water from Aug 2009
>> Larger trunks, taller, fuller (more maturity)
Bigger harvest than the smaller trees in left column


> Almond trees beyond the 300′ limit
recd structured water from Spring 2010
>> Smaller trunks (less maturity), not so tall, less full
Some fruit (almonds) but less than the bigger trees in right column

13 Aug 2010: Almond tree (A1) ~ 9″ diameter trunk, 7′ 6″ tall

13 August 2010: Almond tree (A1) ~ 5″ diameter trunk, 6′ tall


13 Aug 2010: Almond tree (A2) ~ 10.5″ diameter trunk, 9′ 10″ tall

13 Aug 2010: Almond tree ~ 6.5″ diameter trunk, 7′ tall


13 Aug 2010: Almond tree (A3) ~ 10″ diameter trunk, 8′ 8″ tall


13 Aug 2010: Almond tree (A3) ~ 9″ diameter trunk, 7′ 10″ tall


13 Aug 2010: Almond tree (A2) ~ 10″ diameter, 9′ tall
13 Aug 2010: Almond tree (A2) ~ 6″ diameter trunk, 7′ tall



12 Aug 2010: Almond tree ~ note good size of trunk

13 Aug 2010: Almond tree ~ 6″ diameter trunk, 6′ 6″ tall
This little almond tree is the smallest and the farthest out of the Jan 2008 trees ~
again, beyond 300′ so it started to receive structured water only in Spring 2010.
Meanwhile, it was stripped repeatedly of all leaves 2 years running
by harvester ants. Since Spring 2010, fed with structured water, it is
so far (Aug 2010) showing no sign of ants. Wow!
If you got this far – thanks for visiting!
Contact Victoria for more info & to buy your CNS unit –
Best wishes – AntheaG.